Future Cleantech Architects is a cleantech innovation think tank based in Germany that focuses on high-impact research and development, targeting technologies that carry the potential to drive down greenhouse gas emissions disproportionately.
More than 50% of technologies needed to reach net-zero emissions are still in their infancy. Future Cleantech Architects (FCA) is a cleantech innovation think tank that aims to close the remaining innovation gaps to reach net-zero emissions by 2050, and accelerate innovation in critical industries where sustainable solutions are still in very early stages.
Building on a strong network of experts, FCA:
FCA also influences the debate on energy innovation to promote a pragmatic approach towards effective technological solutions, and urges policymakers to intensify and better prioritise their R&D activities. For example, FCA has:
Future Cleantech Architects has been supported by a grant from Founders Pledge, an impact-focused evaluator, due to its innovative work. It was also listed by Vox as one of the top climate action charities in 2022.
We don't currently have further information about the cost-effectiveness of Future Cleantech Architects beyond it doing work in a high-impact cause area and taking a reasonably promising approach.
Please note that GWWC does not evaluate individual charities. Our recommendations are based on the research of third-party, impact-focused charity evaluators our research team has found to be particularly well-suited to help donors do the most good per dollar, according to their recent evaluator investigations. Our other supported programs are those that align with our charitable purpose — they are working on a high-impact problem and take a reasonably promising approach (based on publicly-available information).
At Giving What We Can, we focus on the effectiveness of an organisation's work -- what the organisation is actually doing and whether their programs are making a big difference. Some others in the charity recommendation space focus instead on the ratio of admin costs to program spending, part of what we’ve termed the “overhead myth.” See why overhead isn’t the full story and learn more about our approach to charity evaluation.